Cape Gazette

Rehoboth rally: Reject ocean outfall

Environmental activists call on state to fund alternative plan
By Ryan Mavity | Mar 21, 2014
Photo by: Ron MacArthur David Carter, Delaware Audubon conservation chairman, uses a box of chocolates to make a point. He said if the box belonged to DNREC, people could not be sure what they were getting when it was opened.

Rehoboth Beach — Environmental activists gathered at the Rehoboth Beach Bandstand March 20 to oppose the city’s planned ocean outfall.

Braving a windy day, Gregg Rosner of the Delaware chapter of the Surfrider Foundation said Gov. Jack Markell’s recently proposed clean-water initiative should help pay for an alternative to ocean outfall to dispose of treated city wastewater.

“This measure would protect both valuable tourist dollars and swimable ocean waters for us and preserve our coastal marine life,” Rosner said.

Rehoboth is under court mandate to cease dumping treated effluent into the Lewes-Rehoboth Canal by Wednesday, Dec. 31. An environmental impact statement required to obtain state funding for the $30 million project has been sitting on Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Secretary Collin O’Mara’s desk since August, awaiting approval.

Rosner said an outfall would damage Rehoboth’s high water quality and could negatively affect the city’s economy.

David Carter, conservation chair of for Delaware Audubon Society, said while spray irrigation would be expensive, it is a proven, cost-effective technology. Rosner said he prefers manufactured wetlands, which not only help dispose of effluent but also provide an environment for birds and other wildlife.

Carter said the city should use available technologies such as building wetlands or land application, instead of moving effluent from one bad location to the ocean, an even more sensitive site.

Prior to selecting ocean outfall as its proposed alternative, Rehoboth officials had examined other disposal methods, including land application. City officials decided on ocean outfall as the most cost-effective solution.

Speaking after the rally, Mayor Sam Cooper said he's frustrated by the slow pace for approving the environmental impact statement, and by opponents who want to reopen an issue that has been studied for nearly a decade.

He said land application would require nearly 500 to 700 acres of contiguous land in an area close to the city. "That's hard to find," he said. He also said it's not feasible to build wetlands.

The city has also had offers from private companies to treat its wastewater, but Cooper said under their proposals, the city would lose control of sewer rates.

As Marine Education, Research and Rehabilitation Institute Director Suzanne Thurman speaks, Surfrider Foundation member John Weber listens in the background. (Photo by: Ron MacArthur)
Surfrider Foundation member Gregg Rosner speaks to the media during a March 20 press conference in Rehoboth Beach. (Photo by: Ron MacArthur)
Comments (2)
Posted by: Gregg W Rosner | Mar 21, 2014 12:50

Rehoboth Beach was lead to believe by consultants, that an ocean outfall is cheap, easy to permit, and no one would object. Many years permit.

Ocean outfalls are outdated 1950's technology. The ocean bio-accumulates all the pharmaceuticals and chemicals in the marine organisms that live in the sea, interrupting lifecycles for plankton, fish and marine mammals. Science supports these findings in 2014.

There is a long road ahead Rehoboth, and a public relations liability for everyone that continues to support the permitting process.

On a national level, NRDC, who is responsible for the clean water ratings, is well aware of this process that Rehoboth Beach is pursuing.

DNREC's Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the project falls short of  permissible regulatory explanations, and fails in providing accurate diffuser modeling.

Finally, the federal agencies responsible for all marine species need to approve. With National Marine Fisheries Services being sued for not providing critical habitat for Atlantic sturgeon, which it inclusive of the proposed ocean outfall footprint, just one mile off the beach and in only forty feet of water.



Posted by: Gregg W Rosner | Mar 25, 2014 08:57

The EPA has no qualifying or regulatory standards for pharmaceuticals, endocrine inhibitors, semi-volatile compounds, personal care products (PPCP's), phenolics, caffeine and many other toxic chemicals as cited in the EIS for this DNREC project. They are expensive to remove therefore proprietarily included in the wastewater effluent.

Or in the case of Rehoboth, right into the ocean waters. Caveat emptor for the beach citizens, buying this shiny new Edsel. The people that should be voted out are sitting in your council chambers, silently supporting the demise of community standards.


If you wish to comment, please login.

The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.